The Institute on Women’s Policy Research just released an update of a study of San Francisco’s paid sick days ordinance. San Francisco implemented a paid sick days ordinance in February of 2007 that is very similar to the bill passed by Philadelphia’s City Council this spring.
While many fear that businesses will leave Philadelphia if it has a paid sick days law and people will lose their jobs, the data from San Francisco shows that the growth of employment in the city exceeded the growth in surrounding countries that do not have such an ordinance. Cities throughout the country saw a decline in employment due to the recession, but the decline in San Francisco was less than those in the surrounding counties.
It is particularly interesting that the data shows that in jobs with the lowest rates of access to paid sick days, mainly accommodation and food services, the employment growth in San Francisco still exceeded surrounding counties both prior to and during the recession. Despite theories that the business would suffer in San Francisco due to the ordinance, they are weathering the recession better than other counties.
To read a press release from IWPR on this study, please click here.
Thursday, September 1, 2011
San Francisco Employment Growth Remains Stronger with Paid Sick Days Law Than Surrounding Counties
Labels:
report,
san francisco
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Advisory/Press Release
(40)
autism
(2)
behind the kitchen door
(1)
BKD
(2)
business
(40)
campaign
(2)
cdc
(1)
Center for Social Policy
(1)
center of american progress
(2)
child care
(1)
children
(18)
city
(1)
city council
(8)
Coalition
(81)
costs
(11)
coverage
(2)
COVID-19
(1)
data
(2)
domestic violence
(8)
earned sick time
(25)
economic opportunity institute
(2)
economic security
(27)
elder
(5)
election
(2)
election day
(1)
equal pay
(8)
event
(47)
fair workweek
(1)
family
(33)
Family Act
(5)
family leave
(12)
fda
(1)
Federal Poverty level
(1)
flu
(7)
fmla
(4)
food safety
(1)
food safety modernization act
(1)
gender gap
(2)
H1N1
(7)
health
(4)
health care
(16)
Healthy Families Act
(21)
huffington post
(2)
huffpo
(2)
implementation
(5)
injury
(1)
institute for women's policy research
(2)
insurance
(1)
law
(3)
legislation
(46)
legislators
(1)
legislature
(1)
letter to editor
(7)
letter writing
(6)
LGBT
(4)
living wage
(4)
living wage bill
(8)
low wage
(5)
maternity care coalition
(1)
May 13
(1)
mayor
(17)
minimum wage
(2)
mobilize
(1)
national
(11)
new hampshire university
(1)
New York City
(1)
Newsletter
(3)
Nutter
(2)
NutterWatch
(9)
occupational injury
(1)
op-ed
(7)
other states/cities
(23)
PA
(39)
paid
(1)
paid leave
(31)
paid sick days
(37)
Pennsylvania
(5)
petition
(12)
PFMLI
(1)
Philadelphia
(153)
Philly ROC
(4)
pictures
(5)
Pitt
(1)
pittsburgh
(1)
polling
(2)
poverty
(2)
preemption
(6)
pregnancy
(5)
press
(34)
prevention
(1)
public comment
(5)
public health
(31)
ranking
(1)
regulations
(2)
report
(15)
restaurant workers
(3)
restaurants
(10)
ROC
(1)
safe time
(1)
san francisco
(17)
SB 333
(1)
Seattle
(1)
Shriver Center
(1)
sign-on
(1)
SPM
(1)
stats
(10)
Story
(23)
study
(4)
Supplmental Poverty measure
(1)
take action
(40)
tax credits
(1)
transportation
(1)
trust across america
(1)
university of Boston
(1)
university of Michigan
(1)
University of Pittsburgh
(1)
veto
(1)
video
(3)
Virginia
(1)
volunteer
(1)
vote
(6)
vote for homes
(1)
voter id
(1)
Washington DC
(1)
women
(16)
work flexibility
(1)
work-life balance
(14)
workers
(3)
world economic forum
(1)
No comments:
Post a Comment