Tuesday, July 26, 2011

Economic Security and Paid Sick Days

From EPI's "The Need for Paid Sick Days"
If you read this blog often, you know the basics on the need for paid sick days:
  • 40 million private sector workers nationally have no access to paid sick days (and over 200,000 here in Philadelphia are in the same boat)
  • Employees without paid sick days are more likely to work sick, reducing their productivity at a cost to their employers and themselves
  • Parents without paid sick days are more likely to send children to school while ill, which not only hurts the child in the short-term but also poses risks to long-term health and development
However, a new report from the Economic Policy Institute points out some additional items about economic security and paid sick days that you might not have known.  This report uses a common approach to determining what a family needs to make ends meet: 200% of the Federal Poverty Level, or almost $45,000 for a family of four (although research shows families may need even more).

A two-parent, two child household, with both parents working and earning $10/hour, already earns below 200% of the FPL.  This household needs to earn $3,639 to make ends meet, but only earns $3,470, even without taking an unpaid sick day. One parent using 3.5 days of unpaid sick time in a month (which could happen easily if just one child got sick) would lose the income equivalent to the family's grocery budget for the entire month.

Single parent households earning $10/hour and caring for two children also earn well below what they need to be economically secure: just $1,735 per month, compared to the $2,891 per month economic security threshold.  Missing more than three days of work in a month for this family would put it below the Federal Poverty Level.

As cities, states, and the Federal Government continue to look at the issue of paid sick days, these numbers should be taken into account.  Until we have developed a foolproof way to avoid getting sick, we need to make sure that all families can afford getting sick.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Advisory/Press Release (40) autism (2) behind the kitchen door (1) BKD (2) business (40) campaign (2) cdc (1) Center for Social Policy (1) center of american progress (2) child care (1) children (18) city (1) city council (8) Coalition (81) costs (11) coverage (2) COVID-19 (1) data (2) domestic violence (8) earned sick time (25) economic opportunity institute (2) economic security (27) elder (5) election (2) election day (1) equal pay (8) event (47) fair workweek (1) family (33) Family Act (5) family leave (12) fda (1) Federal Poverty level (1) flu (7) fmla (4) food safety (1) food safety modernization act (1) gender gap (2) H1N1 (7) health (4) health care (16) Healthy Families Act (21) huffington post (2) huffpo (2) implementation (5) injury (1) institute for women's policy research (2) insurance (1) law (3) legislation (46) legislators (1) legislature (1) letter to editor (7) letter writing (6) LGBT (4) living wage (4) living wage bill (8) low wage (5) maternity care coalition (1) May 13 (1) mayor (17) minimum wage (2) mobilize (1) national (11) new hampshire university (1) New York City (1) Newsletter (3) Nutter (2) NutterWatch (9) occupational injury (1) op-ed (7) other states/cities (23) PA (39) paid (1) paid leave (31) paid sick days (37) Pennsylvania (5) petition (12) PFMLI (1) Philadelphia (153) Philly ROC (4) pictures (5) Pitt (1) pittsburgh (1) polling (2) poverty (2) preemption (6) pregnancy (5) press (34) prevention (1) public comment (5) public health (31) ranking (1) regulations (2) report (15) restaurant workers (3) restaurants (10) ROC (1) safe time (1) san francisco (17) SB 333 (1) Seattle (1) Shriver Center (1) sign-on (1) SPM (1) stats (10) Story (23) study (4) Supplmental Poverty measure (1) take action (40) tax credits (1) transportation (1) trust across america (1) university of Boston (1) university of Michigan (1) University of Pittsburgh (1) veto (1) video (3) Virginia (1) volunteer (1) vote (6) vote for homes (1) voter id (1) Washington DC (1) women (16) work flexibility (1) work-life balance (14) workers (3) world economic forum (1)